The positive and harmful effects of using a birth control Research Paper

The positive and harmful effects of using a birth control - Research Paper Example The positive and harmful effects of using a birth control can be best gauged by understanding the advantages and disadvantages of each of the methods of preventing pregnancy. Barrier methods of birth control or contraception are methods that work by physically obstructing the vaginal canal, preventing the sperms from entering the woman’s uterus, thereby inhibiting fertilization. Gordon (2004) avers that the common forms of barrier methods of birth control are male and female condoms, spermicide and diaphragm. A male condom is a thin, flexible sheath made from latex, polyurethane or lambskin. Worn over an erect penis before intercourse, a male condom is equipped with a small reservoir at the tip which collects the sperms during ejaculation and prevents them from entering the vagina. It is the most easy to use, inexpensive and widely available form of contraceptive with no side effects unless one is allergic to latex. When used correctly and consistently, a male condom has an efficacy rate of 85- 86 percent. Gordon (2004) avers that the male condom reduces the risk of transmission of sexually transmitted diseases. On the flip side, a male condom is often accused of dulling sexual sensations and intruding intimate foreplay. A female condom is about a seven-inch long pouch with two flexible rings at each end. Inserted into the vagina prior to the intercourse, the female condom prevents the cervix, vaginal canal, and the surrounding vaginal skin from coming in contact with the penis or the secretions from the penis. The use of female condom entails the absence of any side effects except to the women who are allergic to latex. Ease of availability without prescription and potency to mitigate the risk of transmission of sexually transmitted diseases are the advantages of using female condoms. Female condoms are however

Mission Statement & SWOT Analysis Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 250 words

Mission Statement & SWOT Analysis - Essay Example It means the corporation provides a social platform for the professional people. It shows superior level of organizational commitment towards the general societal welfare. The US based organization has a clear objective to contribute towards the professional society (LinkedIn Corporation). The organization was founded in 2002. Within one era, the company has able to grab almost 20 million members which is itself a staggering record. This kind of huge membership is indicating proactive stance of social responsibility. Across the world the organization has directly or indirectly funded several professional programs. Apart from financial support the company has indirectly communicated towards the society as well. With the help of this business oriented social networking service talented people of the global society has showcased their professional talents and members of the LinkedIn have come across lots of opportunities. All the above discussions and arguments are clearly indicating th at being a professional social networking company the organization has fulfilled all the criterions required for a proactive socially responsible organization. That is why the selection of this stance is absolutely proper with the nature of LinkedIn. Linkedin Corporation. Annual report 2013. April 2014. Web. 10 November. 2014.

Develop A Change Management Strategy With Stakeholders Business Essay

Develop A Change Management Strategy With Stakeholders Business Essay The stakeholder is most important part of stakeholder management. Analysis of stakeholder is the process of to knowing the groups or individual those are possible to affect or be pretentious by a proposed action and organisation to their impact on the. It is significant to value the perspective of  stakeholders. They should be able to involve in direction of a business, as if a wrong decision is made against their will, they would have  lost investment  in a way that could have been avoided (Friedman (2000)).  Stakeholders must be fulfilled at least modestly or public policies, organisations, community, or even countries and civilization will not succeed (Huntingdon (1996)). Specific stakeholder definition be different, concurs in the need for stakeholder support to construct and continue pleasing coalitions (Riker 1986; Baumgartner and Jones, 1993) and to make certain continuing possibility of organisations (Eden and Ackermann (1998), Bryson, Gibbons and Shay (2000), Abramson and Kamensky, (2001)) as well as strategy, strategy, and preparation. Here factors which affects strength of stakeholder organisation: Establishment: independent with clear objects and configuration.(Terry Macdonald, 2008) Member: Representative and acceptable, high level of association. Financial funds : acceptable and sustainable to fund involvement Staff and workplace holders: appropriate skills to bring selected functions. This includes strong support skills. Policy: clear and attainable polices. Visibility: to be identify for task accomplishment (Jaime Rivera, ((2007) Further that analysis of Stakeholder firstly to identify who are stakeholders then after to find out influence, interest and power, so you know to whom you should focus. Finally the good understanding of the stakeholder management of visibility is encouraged by the personal goals and moral concerns and thats why it is important for managing impressions and group change. The finally expand a good considerate of the most significant stakeholders. So that you know how they are probable to take achievement that you can outline this analysis on a stakeholder management Develop a change management strategy with stakeholders Strategy for stakeholder Classify the stakeholders whose commitment is required. Each kind of stakeholder, explain the required change, superficial benefits and anticipated resistance.( Michael Jay Polonsky,  2008) Expand accomplishment plans together with ones for the stakeholder groups that are not satisfactorily commit. Significant group regularly ignored is higher-level organisation; they must be integrated one of the key groups. (Rogers, Everett M.2003) Change management strategy Change management strategy is key factor for organisation. It is involve direct or indirect in to business therefore each and every time business has to keep changing in process of organisation. (Robert S. Kaplan and David P. [internet] http://finntrack.co.uk/learners/strategic_renewal.htm) EXPLAIN THE MODEL ABOVE WHAT DOES IT SHOW Change leadership: organisational change need rapidly change with leadership were mobilized change through executive leadership and need strategic decision making Stakeholder commitment: it is important for organisation that commitment from stakeholder and to make decision for supplementary benefits. Business Disciplines: executive strategies to work, they must be related and integrated transversely many function finance, manufacturing, sales, marketing and other. The Balanced Scorecard can association these different and dispersed functions. Structure: increasing methods to continue the change. Talent creation: increasing skills and knowledge to support the change in organisation. Pay and intensive: for growth of organisation its also important to manage pay and intensive for employee. WHERES REFERENCE However, were stakeholders have been identified; their interest of organisation, characteristics and circumstances to be better understood. It is particularly important that stakeholders communicate their own concern. Here checklist of questions for each stakeholder group capacity is counting. What are the expectations of the policies or institution of stakeholders? What kind of stakeholders benefits and costs? What are the difference conflicts with the objectives of the policy or institution stakeholder interests? Which kind of stakeholders recourses has the mobilised? Here some useful methodologies are there bringing a strategic change WHERES REFERENCE Brainstorming (Namken and Rapp, 1997) Brainstorming is a trouble solve method ( namken and rapp,1997). Brainstorming is not a part of strategic development, but is used as put into operation throughout the planning process. It is a useful for allocation ideas with group or more then one person system to learn. (Reinig, Briggs, Nunamaker, 2007) Different points in the planning, the facilitator may engage the group in brainstorming techniques. However to be successful, a brainstorming session must pursue four rules which are expressiveness, postpone idea evaluation, .quantity versus quality and piggyback ideas (Forsythe, 2010). Semi-structured interviews Interviewing is one of the general tools and techniques for organisation. It is good for small sector but not suitable for large number of study (Drever, Eric 1995).It is useful for comfortable checklist of issue. At the same time as consent to other issues to occur and be pursue. This approach is mostly supportive for cross-checking, classification of common position, identification of tradeoffs and identification of managerial frameworks of stakeholders. Digging up existing data Collection of recorded materials may tool shed light on stakeholders security, individuality and situation. Well its always meaningful inquisitive and look through for information and recording information. There is almost for eternity additional of it than at initial come into view and occasionally establish in the most unlikely places. Time lines It can be arranged with stakeholders of the record of associations and contact of challenging policies, establishment and process, with discussion of basis and effect of a range of changes. Diagrams Diagrams may help many people to get a fast idea of what is designed or talk as regards. Well they can work to motivate conversation by both literate and non literate group. However diagram and visualisations work present a focus for notice while converse an issue, signify complex issues basically, motivate ideas and consequently assist in management. Intermittently people didnt work well in stipulations of diagrams think or and rather verbal conversation with images of real examples and furthermore story. Evaluate the system stakeholders in the planning of change Consequently research manager classify and compliant of the level of effort to allocate to individually stakeholder and preferred form of obligation and determine reliability. Dedication of stakeholder facilitate for dynamic development all the way through the process of planning and project. Previously period of stakeholders obligation most important issue is to identification from the concurrence establishment level and after that makes that program in to the important implement and develops throughout the processes of intensification. Thus, helpful commitment provide revelation of is recent expectation. The primary commitment obtains just about a problem or predicament in contras with the instant situation. Commitment of stakeholders requirements is to managing and describe with sentimental superior strategy. Purpose of organisation must gives result of development, budget and manage all responsibility of organisation. Differentiate of predicament management stakeholder management and stake holder engagement Stakeholder engagement characterized: Ongoing and Early Stakeholder Consultation Consultation founded on well developing some understanding and agreement between stake holders communicated plan which is developing more and more effective consultation process. purpose any pre-conditions for consultation affected stakeholders issues prioritised carefully selected engagement methodologies clearly identified individual responsibility among the program and project levels Document consultation process and actions and feedback to stakeholders Comprehensive and Timely Information Disclosure factual information earliest possible disclosure identify with timing related risks enthusiastically available admiration for perceptive information planned to assist engagement Create a strategy for managing resistance to change One of the main problem facing leading executive is that of effecting important strategic change in their organizations.It develops a number of expounding frameworks which contrate on the links between the development of strategy in organizations, proportions of mutual culture and managerial accomplishment.In allowing for such linkages, by illustrate them with examples from work undertaken in company, it also seeks to advance our understanding of the problems and means of managing change. Managing Resistance to Change is a methodology that is designed to help people in organisations face resistance and cross the street to actually manage the transitions experienced within organisational change. Ways to reduce resistance to change: Involve interested parties in the planning of change by asking them for suggestions and incorporating their ideas. clearly explain the need for the change by communicating the strategic decision personally and in written form. Address the people needs of those involved. Disrupt only what needs to be changed. Help people retain friendships, comfortable settings and group norms wherever possible. design the flexibility into change by phasing it wherever possible. This will allow people to complete current efforts and assimilate new behaviors along the way. Allow employees to redefine their roles during the course of implementing change. be open and honest. do not leave openings for people to return to the status quo. If you and your organisations are not ready to commit yourselves to the change, dont announce the strategy. Focus continually on the positive aspects of the change. Be specific where you can. Deliver training programs that develop basic skills as opposed to processes such as: conducting meetings, communication, teambuilding, self-esteem, and coaching. Create a strategy for managing resistance to change Method of managing resistance design to change is that to help people in organisation face and to cross boundaries. Actually control the transition practiced inside organisational change. How to decrease resistance to change: In the planning of change by asking gathering and involve interested people for proposition and integrate their ideas. Distribute training planning that develops basic skills as contrasting to processes such as: performing meetings, communication, teambuilding, self-worth, and lessons. Evidently classify requirement for the change through communicating the strategic decision individually and in on paper form. To be honest and open. Deal with the needs of community of those occupied. Interrupt only what requirements to be changed. Help people preserve friendships, contented settings and group standard wherever potential. Focal point frequently on the helpful aspects of the change. Where you can be specific. When possible making change by phasing it. It will allow people to entire efforts and incorporate new behaviours by the side of the way. Allocate workforce to redefine their roles throughout the course of put into operation of change. Be able to plan to implement models for ensuring ongoing change Develop appropriate models for change Thus, over many years of research in management, johns Kotter have established that most of all major change efforts in organisations are unsuccessful (Dr.john Kotter). Why do they not succeed? For the reason that organisations may be over and over again do not take the holistic approach requisite to see the change through. Conversely, following the 8-Step Process outline by Dr. Kotter, organisations can keep away from malfunction and become practiced at change. Organisations can expand their probability of success by improving their ability to change, both today and in the potential. Organisations cannot succeed, without this aptitude to become accustomed constantly. Following the 8 Step Process for Change will assist organisations accomplishes something in an increasingly changing world. 8 steps model by Dr. Jhon kotter (http://gtwebmarque.com/wikis/gtwm/index.php/Change_Management) Increase Urgency In rush to build a plan and obtain action, most organisation ignore this step. Certainly close to 50% of the organisation that be unsuccessful to build required change make their mistakes at the beginning. Organisation may take too lightly how hard it is to force people out of their console region or miscalculate how successfully they have done or basically lack of complaint needed to expand suitable urgency. On the other hand, identify with the importances of a sense of urgency are good at attractive of the pounding their organisation and powerful whether the state of the organisation is: Complacency   Satisfaction can take place whether organisation is at the top of their market or facing insolvent. It is a state people fail to respond to signs that actions have to be taken, significant themselves and each other. False urgency   Community are full of activity, functioning but their actions dont result in helping the Create organisation accomplish something in their most important objective True urgency   Every single day people are evidently focused on building real progress. To enormous hazards urgent behaviour is driven by a principle that the world contains great opportunities and. It inspires a gut-level resolve to move, and win, now. Build Guiding Coalition To put together a group with sufficient power to guide the change no one person, no substance how proficient, is capable of without help:   increasing the correct vision,   communicating it to vast numbers of people,   eradicates all of the key impediments,   produce short term be successful   most important and organisation major of change developments, Fasten latest approaches subterranean in an organisations ethnicity.   The significance of panels to assessment creation in a speedily changing world, multifaceted organisations are enforced to make decisions more rapidly and with not as much of certainty as they would like and with superior forfeit than they would have a preference. It is clear managers, acting in concert, are the only efficient being that can make productive decisions under these situations. There are four character of an Effective Guiding Coalition: Position Power, expertise, credibility, leadership. The assemblys are supposed to have enough verified leaders to be able to drive the change procedure.   Get the vision right To make patent how the upcoming will be different from the times past. Truthful apparition serves three significant functions. Primary it makes things easier thousands of more complete decisions, second, it motivates people to take action in the right direction even if the primary steps are tender, and third, it assist to organize the actions of different people in a amazingly fast and efficient way. A clear and powerful vision will do far more than an demanding order or micromanagement can ever hope to accomplish.   Several visions are deceptively mundane. The vision is part of a larger organisation that comprises strategies planning and budgets. Although the vision is attach that holds these belongings in concert and makes sense of them together for the intellect and the heart. A good vision can demand give up enterprises stakeholders in command to produce a better future for all. Thus, visions must be seen as tactically practicable To be effective. must take into, a vision description the current actuality of the enterprise, but also set forth goals that are truthfully determined. However leaders know how to make these determined goals look achievable. Vision must provide real guidance; it must be focused, flexible and simple to correspond. It must together motivate action and lead that action. It should be making relevant decisions, but not be so constricting as to decrease the possibility of empowering action. Finally, it must be communicable. If it cannot be explained quickly in a way that makes intuitive sense, it becomes useless. Effective visions have six key characters, imaginable, desirable, feasible, focused, flexible, and communicable. Communication for buy-in As many people as possible ensuring, understand and accept the vision, in advance a considerate and commitment to a new direction is never an easy assignment, particularly in composite organisations. Under communication and inconsistency are uncontrolled. In cooperation create stalled alteration. Therefore most organisation under communicate their visions by at least a factor a single memo publicizing the transformation or even a series of speeches by the management and the executive team are never enough. To be effective, the vision must be communicated in hour-by-hour actions. The vision will be referred to in emails, in meetings, in arrangement it will be corresponded everywhere.   Communicating the vision for the revolution, there are some things to continue in mind, the vision should be: simple, vivid, repeatable, invitational. Enable Action As possible removing as many barriers and unleash people to do their most excellent work. Structural barrier many times the interior structure of organisation is at chances with the change vision. Organisations that declare to desire to be customer focused finds its structures section resources and responsibilities for products and service. Organisation that assert to desire to build more local receptiveness have layers of management that second deduction and disapprove of provincial decisions. Organisation desires to amplify productivity and become a low-priced manufacturer have massive staff groups that constantly initiate valuable measures and program. Many times, these are the most difficult barrier to get past because they are part of the interior structure of the company. Realigning motivation and presentation appraisal to reflect the change vision can have a sympathetic effect on the ability to complete the change vision. Create short terms wins In the center leaders for long-term change attempt, short-term wins are necessary. Without attention running a change effort to short-term presentation is very risky. The conducting alliance becomes a significant force in identifying important improvements that can occur between six and 18 months. These wins help ensure the generally change initiatives success. Investigate shows that companies that experience significant short-term wins by fourteen and twenty-six months after the change initiative begins are much more likely to complete the transformation.   Comprehend these improvements is a challenge. In any change initiative, program get belated, there is a desire to ensure that customers are not affected; political forces are at work all of which slow the ability to carry out as promised. Though, short-term wins are important. Dont let up Confrontation is always to come in the wings to re-assert it. Thus if you are successful in the early stages, you may just drive resistors underground where they remain for an opportunity to appear when you least anticipate it. They might celebrate and then suggest taking a break to savor the victory. The consequences of letting up can be very dangerous, the new behaviors and practices must be driven into the culture to ensure long-term success.   Once regression begins, rebuilding momentum is a daunting task successful major change initiative, have some steps as bellow: More project being added supplementary people being brought in to facilitate with the changes Senior managements focused on giving simplicity to an aligned vision and shared principle Employees give power to at all levels to lead development concentrated interdependencies between areas of business continuous attempt to keep importance high regular show of proof that the new method is working Make it stick Secure latest approach in the ethnicity for sustained change new practices must produce deep roots in order to stay behind firmly planted in the culture. It is composed of norms of behavior and shared values. These societal forces are extremely strong. Each and every individual that connect an organisation is indoctrinated into its culture. Generally without even realizing its inaction is maintained by the combined group of employees over years and existence. Modify whether consistent or inconsistent with the older culture are difficult to ingrain.   Cultural change comes last, not first You must be able to establish that the new way is superior to the old The achievement must be visible and well communicated strengthen the culture with every new employee 4.3 build up suitable method to monitor development Regular evaluation of development is essential in instruct to ensure that arrangement purpose are accomplished in a timely conduct course improvement may be requisites as new information be converted into available or new prospects or intimidation expand. The determining procedure of confined presentation process and performance results should be translucent and willingly obtainable to the public. The presentation outcome for each contributes programs should also be release for reconsider, as production, workforce and skilled job seeker all require to be acquainted with services work. Additional, tax payers have to be informed of the point to which the expenses of public funds give way result helpful to the community. Contributor and other associates that do not meet presentation standards or precede the arrangement aims and objectives should obtain technical support to improve their service release. If organisations or individuals do not achieve improved results, they have to be authorized and finally dropped from the public labour force in organisation. Funds should be attached to presentation capacity which explanation for the particular challenges of effective in diverse community.

Cannibalism Essay -- Cannibals Cultural Culture Essays

Cannibalism "Cannibalism, or institutionalized anthropophagi, has been part of human culture from the earliest times. Human teeth marks in ancient human bones offer clues cannibalism was commonplace. When Christopher Columbus explored the Americas, the term cannibal was coined after the Caniba, â€Å"a ferocious group of man-eaters who lived in the Caribbean islands† (Salisbury, 2001, Brief history . . .). The idea of cannibalism in the New World evoked paranoia in Europe. Any such practice was considered demonic and sacrilegious. Cannibalism was a topic of ancient horror stories. In Greek mythology, â€Å"after Thyestes unwittingly ate the flesh of his own children, the Sun was so appalled that he turned back on his course and plunged the world into darkness† (Hodgkinson, 2001). Cannibalism has been detested throughout Western history and was declared a sin by Pope Innocent IV in the sixteenth century. Spain’s Queen Isabella â€Å"decreed that Spanish colonists could only legally enslave natives who were cannibals, giving the colonists an economic interest in making such allegations† (Salisbury). Many natives were falsely accused of cannibalism and were made inferior as a result. Although they criminalized and enslaved West Indians for cannibalism, Europeans imported mummified body parts from Egypt and consumed medicine made from them to cure various diseases. Such treatment was commonly prescribed by seventeenth century doctors (Salisbury). Cannibalism is a significant part of Western history and it has sparked much controversy. In some present cultures, cannibalism remains a way of life. The Kim Yal people in Indonesia and the Wari’ people of the Amazon both have practiced cannibalism as part of their heritage.... ...rty and starvation struck the region. One of the most remembered stories of cannibalism in recent history was the 1972 crash of a Uruguayan airliner into the snowy Chilean Andes. An amateur rugby team en route from Montevideo to Santiago met with disaster and was lost in the high wilderness. Of the thirty-two passengers who survived the impact, only sixteen endured ten weeks of subfreezing weather and avalanches before their rescue. Their story was chilling. The survivors admitted to eating the flesh of the deceased, one by one, after each teammate consented to provide their bodies for food after they died. The world was shocked. Their dramatic accounts were re-created in the 1993 movie, Alive. The deceased victims were seen as heroes because they sacrificed themselves for the lives of the others. In times of disaster, cannibalism is often the only way of survival." Cannibalism Essay -- Cannibals Cultural Culture Essays Cannibalism "Cannibalism, or institutionalized anthropophagi, has been part of human culture from the earliest times. Human teeth marks in ancient human bones offer clues cannibalism was commonplace. When Christopher Columbus explored the Americas, the term cannibal was coined after the Caniba, â€Å"a ferocious group of man-eaters who lived in the Caribbean islands† (Salisbury, 2001, Brief history . . .). The idea of cannibalism in the New World evoked paranoia in Europe. Any such practice was considered demonic and sacrilegious. Cannibalism was a topic of ancient horror stories. In Greek mythology, â€Å"after Thyestes unwittingly ate the flesh of his own children, the Sun was so appalled that he turned back on his course and plunged the world into darkness† (Hodgkinson, 2001). Cannibalism has been detested throughout Western history and was declared a sin by Pope Innocent IV in the sixteenth century. Spain’s Queen Isabella â€Å"decreed that Spanish colonists could only legally enslave natives who were cannibals, giving the colonists an economic interest in making such allegations† (Salisbury). Many natives were falsely accused of cannibalism and were made inferior as a result. Although they criminalized and enslaved West Indians for cannibalism, Europeans imported mummified body parts from Egypt and consumed medicine made from them to cure various diseases. Such treatment was commonly prescribed by seventeenth century doctors (Salisbury). Cannibalism is a significant part of Western history and it has sparked much controversy. In some present cultures, cannibalism remains a way of life. The Kim Yal people in Indonesia and the Wari’ people of the Amazon both have practiced cannibalism as part of their heritage.... ...rty and starvation struck the region. One of the most remembered stories of cannibalism in recent history was the 1972 crash of a Uruguayan airliner into the snowy Chilean Andes. An amateur rugby team en route from Montevideo to Santiago met with disaster and was lost in the high wilderness. Of the thirty-two passengers who survived the impact, only sixteen endured ten weeks of subfreezing weather and avalanches before their rescue. Their story was chilling. The survivors admitted to eating the flesh of the deceased, one by one, after each teammate consented to provide their bodies for food after they died. The world was shocked. Their dramatic accounts were re-created in the 1993 movie, Alive. The deceased victims were seen as heroes because they sacrificed themselves for the lives of the others. In times of disaster, cannibalism is often the only way of survival."

John Stuart Mill and Utilitarianism Essay

Abstract The paper presents the life of John Stuart Mill through his biography. A glimpse on his exceptional life as a child was also included in his biography. Likewise, his major contributions as a philosopher and economist were also discussed. Since John Stuart Mill was a proponent of utilitarianism, the paper focuses its discussion on Mill and utilitarianism. The views of John Stuart Mill on utilitarianism and how it differs from Bentham’s views were given much attention in the paper. The history of utilitarianism was also presented to show how utilitarianism evolved. The confusions of many people, regarding who the real founder of utilitarianism, was clarified through the history of utilitarianism. Introduction John Stuart Mill (1806-1873), is a British philosopher-economist, who is the son of James Mill. He is one of the best 19th century thinkers. In economics, he was influenced by the theories of Adam Smith, David Ricardo and Thomas Robert Malthus, and his Principles of Political Economy is a little more than a restatement of their ideas. He had a great impact on 19th century British thought, not only in philosophy and economics but also in the areas of political science, logic, and ethics. He was a proponent of utilitarianism. He systematized the utilitarian doctrines of his father and Jeremy Bentham in such works as Utilitarianism (1863), basing knowledge upon human experience and emphasizing human reason. In political economy, Mill advocated those policies that he believed most consistent with individual liberty, and he emphasized that liberty could be threatened as much by social as by political tyranny. He is probably most famous for his essay â€Å"On Liberty† (1859). He studied pre-Marxian socialist doctrine, and, although he did not become a socialist, he worked actively for improvement of the conditions of the working people. Utilitarianism is a philosophy which has been around for centuries, and is still active and popular in the modern world. It is important not only in philosophy itself, but in disciplines such as economics, political science, and decision theory. To some people, Utilitarianism seems to be the only ethical philosophy which is obviously correct. To others, it seems to be quite misconceived, even reprehensible. Biography of John Stuart Mill. John Stuart Mill (1806-1873) was a British philosopher, economist, moral and political theorist, and administrator. He was the most influential English-speaking philosopher of the nineteenth century. His views are of continuing significance, and are generally recognized to be among the deepest and certainly the most effective defenses of empiricism and of a liberal political view of society and culture. The overall aim of his philosophy is to develop a positive view of the universe and the place of humans in it, one which contributes to the progress of human knowledge, individual freedom and human well-being. John Stuart Mill was born on May 20, 1806 in Pentonville, London. He was the eldest son of James Mill, a Scottish philosopher and historian who had come to London and become a leading figure in the group of philosophical radicals which aimed to further the utilitarian philosophy of Jeremy Bentham. His mother was Harriet Barrow, who seems to have had very little influence upon him. Mill was educated by his father, with the advice and assistance of Jeremy Bentham and Francis Place. He was given an extremely rigorous upbringing, and was deliberately shielded from association with children of his own age other than his siblings. His father, a follower of Bentham and an adherent of associationism, had as his explicit aim to create a genius intellect that would carry on the cause of utilitarianism and its implementation after he and Bentham were dead. John Stuart Mill as a child was exceptional. At the age of three he was taught the Greek alphabet and long lists of Greek words with their English equivalents. By the age of eight he had read Aesop’s Fables, Xenophon’s Anabasis, and the whole of Herodotus, and was acquainted with Lucian, Diogenes Laertius, Isocrates and six dialogues of Plato. He had also read a great deal of history in English and had been taught arithmetic. At fifteen, John Stuart Mill undertook the study of Bentham’s various fragments on the theory of legal evidence. These had an inspiring influence on him, fixing in him his life-long goal of reforming the world in the interest of human well-being. At the age of seventeen, he had completed advanced and thorough courses of study in Greek literature and philosophy, chemistry, botany, psychology, and law. In 1822 Mill began to work as a clerk for his father in the examiner’s office of the India House. In 1823, he co-founded the Westminster Review with Jeremy Bentham as a journal for philosophical radicals. This intensive study however had injurious effects on Mill’s mental health, and state of mind. At the age of twenty-one, he suffered a nervous breakdown. This was caused by the great physical and mental arduousness of his studies which had suppressed any feelings or spirituality he might have developed normally in childhood. Nevertheless, this depression eventually began to dissipate, as he began to find solace in the poetry of William Wordsworth. His capacity for emotion resurfaced, Mill remarking that the â€Å"cloud gradually drew off†. In 1851, Mill married Harriet Taylor after 21 years of an at times intense friendship and love affair. Taylor was a significant influence on Mill’s work and ideas during both friendship and marriage. His relationship with Harriet Taylor reinforced Mill’s advocacy of women’s rights. He died in Avignon, France in 1873, and is buried alongside his wife. John Stuart Mill and the Classical School of Thought Classical economics starts with Adam Smith, as a coherent economic theory, continues with the British economists Thomas Robert Malthus and David Ricardo, and culminates in the synthesis of John Stuart Mill, who as a young man was a follower of David Ricardo. Among the classical economists in the three-quarters of a century, although they have differences of opinion between Smith’s Wealth of Nations and Mill’s Principles of Political Economy (1848), the members of the group still agreed on major principles. All believed in private property, free markets, and, in Mill’s words, that â€Å"only through the principle of competition has political economy any pretension to the character of a science. † They shared Smith’s strong suspicion of government and his ardent confidence in the power of self-interest represented by his famous â€Å"invisible hand,† which reconciled public benefit with individual pursuit of private gain. From Ricardo, classicists derived the notion of diminishing returns, which held that as more labor and capital were applied to land, yields after â€Å"a certain and not very advanced stage in the progress of agriculture steadily diminished. † Through Smith’s emphasis on consumption, rather than on production, the scope of economics was considerably broadened. Smith was optimistic about the chances of improving general standards of life. He called attention to the importance of permitting individuals to follow their self-interest as a means of promoting national prosperity. History of Utilitarianism Utilitarianism is a fairly old philosophy, and major elements of it are even older. The best known, and most prolific, utilitarian philosophers were Jeremy Bentham (1748-1832), and John Stuart Mill (1806-1873). In their time, utilitarianism was a significant philosophical movement in Britain, and the utilitarians were some of the leading social reformers of the time. John Stuart Mill, especially, is quite well known today. Many people seem to think, unfortunately, that utilitarianism began with Bentham and ended with Mill. This is quite wrong in two ways. First, Bentham was not the first utilitarian, although he did coin the word â€Å"utilitarianism†. Various pre-Benthamite philosophers were advocating utilitarian positions several decades before Bentham was born. Also, utilitarianism has a lot in common with ancient non-utilitarian philosophers, such as Mo Tzu and Jesus. Both of these people advocated a doctrine of universal love. These doctrines were not precisely stated enough to compare directly with utilitarianism, but they were definitely universalist and egalitarian, and had strong currents of consequentialism, welfarism, and (at least in the case of Mo Tzu) maximization. The second problem with the popular misconception is that there has been a great deal of development in utilitarianism since Mill. Some people are aware, for example, of the later developments of Preference Utilitarianism and Rule Utilitarianism. Mill is still usually regarded as the main resource on Utilitarianism, though. Part of the problem is that he wrote about it comprehensively, and there have been few good comprehensive books about utilitarianism since then. Modern utilitarianism is in many ways far more sophisticated than that of Mill. Most importantly, it has become connected with many developments in areas such as economics, political science, and decision theory. Utilitarianism has always enjoyed an essentially unique position as the only philosophy which applied to all areas of human endeavor in a reasonably straightforward endeavor, and committed to specific positions on how conflict between various interests should be resolved. In Mill’s time, utilitarianism was strongly linked to economics, although the two disciplines subsequently diverged. Today, Preference Utilitarianism as a theory underlies many ideas in the sciences, and has been formalized to a degree that Mill never dreamed of. The idea of utility maximization even has applications entirely outside of philosophy, such as its use in artificial intelligence to represent how a computer could make trade-offs between different goals. Utilitarianism today exists both as a powerful kind of formal reasoning, and as the philosophy which says that such reasoning should define the moral ideal in human affairs. Utilitarianism can even be formally derived from a set of four reasonable seeming axioms, something that no other major philosophy can claim. The modern state of utilitarianism in relation to other philosophies is actually quite unusual. Most philosophies exist in theoretical isolation, based on ideas which have little in common with ideas in other disciplines. Other disciplines, in turn, don’t have much formal contact with them. Most major philosophies have a significant presence in politics and social issues, with people explicitly referring to issues such as rights and equality when debating how society should be organized. Utilitarianism, on the other hand, exists mostly in the background of popular discourse. People who claim to follow other philosophies often make utilitarian arguments when it suits them, and utilitarian arguments are often used by people who wouldn’t claim to follow any specific philosophy at all. Many philosophers make sure to explicitly place their ideas in opposition to utilitarianism, as if it were always lurking in the background ready to pounce on the unsuspecting theory. In part, this may be because utilitarianism is a sort of philosophical hydra, growing a new position for each one that is dismissed. While specific utilitarian ideas are vulnerable to attack, the underlying sentiments have proven amazingly resilient and have evolved to remain entirely current. Throughout the twentieth century, many philosophers confidently predicted that utilitarianism had been devastated, and would soon fall out of favor – only to be disproved when it remained as popular as ever. Utilitarian perspectives have also been quietly adopted in domains ranging from economics, political science, and decision theory to cognitive science and artificial intelligence. This has given modern utilitarianism a powerful formulation like no other, and a strong applied tradition. The old questions of how to measure utility, and how to maximize it most effectively in practice, have been extensively researched outside of philosophy. The result of this is that while other philosophies often talk in general terms of how they should be applied, and have problems in resolving conflicts between various principles, utilitarianism is at the cutting edge of rigorously applicable principles. Which is still, it should be mentioned, far from perfect. John Stuart Mill on Utilitarianism Utilitarianism is the most influential moral philosophy in the last two centuries. Jeremy Bentham is the acknowledged founder of utilitarianism. He admitted however that he took over the principle of utility from David Hume. By stating categorically that there is an ultimate good – a summum bonum, John Stuart Mill, the most famous utilitarian, laid the foundation of his moral philosophy. According to Mill, all moral actions should be aimed at attaining this good. Mill insists that this good is happiness. According to the Greatest Happiness Principle, †¦ the ultimate end, with reference to and for the sake of which all other things are desirable – whether we are considering our own good or that of other people – is an existence exempt as far as possible from pain, and as rich as possible in enjoyments, both in point of quantity and quality†¦ ( Boyce, p. 36) Mill states his teological position by insisting that the rightness of an action is determined by the actual consequences. It cannot be done by simply examining the nature of the act alone. The real value of our actions depends on whether it promotes the good or not. The creed which accepts as the foundation of morals Utility or Greatest Happiness Principle holds that actions are right in proportion as they tend to promote happiness. Wrong, as they tend to produce the reverse of happiness. By happiness is intended pleasure, and the absence of pain, by unhappiness, pain and the privation of pleasure. (Boyce, p. 36) Mill differs radically from Bentham on two important points. He is vehemently against the purely quantitative treatment of the principle of utility. According to Mill, we have to admit that some pleasures are intrinsically superior to others. He disdainfully said: It is better to be a human being dissatisfied, than a pig satisfied; better to be Socrates dissatisfied than a fool satisfied. And if the fool, or the pig, is of a different opinion, it is because they only know their own side of the question. The other party to the comparison knows both sides. (Solomon, p. 310 ) To confirm his point, Mill cites Epicurus (341-270 B. C. ) who also espoused the view that while the good life is the life of pleasure, he does not mean only bodily and sensual pleasure alone. These are higher forms like intellectual and spiritual pleasure. According to both philosophers some pleasures are intrinsically superior to others. When there are some issues that arise about the criterion for judging the quality of pleasure. Mill argues that: If I am asked what I mean by difference of quality of pleasures, or what makes one pleasure more valuable than another, merely as a pleasure, except its being greater in amount, there is but one possible answer. Of two pleasures if there is be one to which all or almost all who have experience of both give a decided preference, irrespective of a feeling of moral obligation to prefer it, that is the more desirable pleasure. If one of the two is, by those who are competently acquainted with both, placed so far above the other that they prefer it, even though knowing it to be attended with a greater amount of discontent, and would not resign it for any quantity of the other pleasure which their name is capable of, we are justified in ascribing to the preferred enjoyment a superiority in quality so far outweighing quantity as to render it, in comparison of small account. (Solomon, pp. 297-298). The example given by Mill is Socrates who is acquainted with both bodily pleasure and intellectual pleasure. If you ask which pleasure is more desirable, obviously, according to Mill, Socrates will choose intellectual pleasure. So the criterion for judging which pleasure is better than another must be made by a judge who has experienced both kinds of pleasures. Indeed, Mill is calling for an inter-subjective consensus of people who experienced both types of pleasure. The introduction of quality of pleasure added undue complication to Bentham’s quantitative calculus. The higher pleasure consists of the more intellectual, artistic and even spiritual, like reading poetry, speculating about the nature or the cosmos, enjoying of music and the visual arts etc. as opposed to the more sensual and physical, like eating good food, indulging in sex and other physical stimulation. It must be mentioned though, that Mill is not excluding the lower pleasure from consideration. But obviously, he personally prefers the higher pleasures. Remember that it is the pig that provides the model for lower pleasure; in contrast, it is Socrates who exemplifies the quest for higher pleasures. Mill’s proof on the soundness of the principle of utility: The only proof capable of being given that an object is visible is that people actually see it. The only proof that a sound is audible is that people actually hear it; and so the other sources of our experience. In like manner, I apprehend, the sole evidence is it possible to produce that anything is desirable that people do actually desire it†¦ no reason can be given why the general happiness is desirable, except that each person, so far as he believes it to be attainable, desire his own happiness. (Solomon, p. 319 ). This proof has been the subject of debate among utlilitarian scholars. According to Solomon, the most generous interpretation of Mill’s proof are the following: one’s own happiness or pleasure is the only thing desired by each person; the general happiness or the happiness of all is the only thing desired for itself by all; the only test of something being desirable is its being desired; the general happiness is the only thing desired in itself; and lastly, the only test of the rightness or wrongness of actions is their tendency to promote the general happiness (the greatest happiness for the greatest number). Summary and Conclusion John Stuart Mill, being a philosopher and an economist had a great impact in the 19th century british thought not only in the field of philosophy and economics but also in other areas of political science, logic, and ethics. His exceptional childhood because of his father’s rigorous training had injurious effects on his mental health, and state of mind. Nevertheless, his father was able to create a genius in him that would carry on the cause of utilitarianism and its implementation after the death of his father and Bentham. One of the important works of John Stuart Mill was Utilitarianism, which argues for the philosophy of Utilitarianism. This philosophy was primarily formed by Jeremy Bentham, but Mill’s father James Mill was also a proponent. Utilitarianism holds that actions are good in proportion to the amount of happiness produced and number of people happiness is produced in. Mill’s main innovation to Utilitarianism is the idea of a hierarchy of pleasures. Bentham had treated all forms of happiness as equal, whereas Mill argued that intellectual and moral pleasures and developments were superior to more physical forms of pleasure. His views are of continuing significance, and are recognized to be among the deepest and certainly the most effective defenses of empiricism and of a liberal political view of society and culture. The overall aim of his philosophy is to develop a positive view of the universe and the place of humans in it, one which contributes to the progress of human knowledge, individual freedom and human well-being. His views are not entirely original, having their roots in the British empiricism of John Locke, George Berkeley and David Hume, and in the utilitarianism of Jeremy Bentham. But he gave them a new depth, and his formulations were sufficiently articulate to gain for them a continuing influence among a broad public. References: ACUNA, A. E. 2001. Philosophical Analysis. 5th Edition. U. P. Department of Philosophy. Diliman, Quezon City. Autobiography by John Stuart Mill. http://www. utilitarianism. com/jsmill. htm. BOYCE, W. D. 1978. Moral Reasoning. University of Nebraska Press. London. MONTGOMERIE, I. 2000. A Utilitarian FAQ. http://www. ianmontgomerie. com /manifesto/utilitarian. SOLOMON, R. C. Morality and the Good Life. 1984. McGraw-Hill Book Company. New York. Webster’s Family Encyclopedia. 1999. Vol. 6. Archer Worldwide Inc. Great Neck, New York, U. S. A.

Physical Security Essay

INTRODUCTION. Physical security starts with a rather simple basic premise; those who do not belong on your institution’s property should be excluded from your institution. This may happen in three often interrelated ways: when those who do not belong are identified, stopped and denied admission, when those who do not belong are denied admission by a physical device, such as a locked door. When those who do not belong are denied admission because they decide that your institution is too difficult to enter and thus they do note entry. This section will consider the various methods of excluding those who do not belong: access control, key control and locks, protective devices and alarms, windows and doors, fencing and gates, protective lighting, general deterrence. PHYSICAL SECURITY AND CRIME PREVENTION AND CONTROL Access Control Access control means that, when your facility is open, no visitor, delivery service person or unknown individual is able to enter your facility without being both observed directly or indirectly. Several techniques to accomplish that goal may include any or all of the following. Security Desk A security desk should be setup in them in lobby of each building which has an open-access or open-door policy. A sign-in and outlet supervised by an employee who validates identification prior to allowing visitors to proceed into the building, is highly advisable. Most supermarkets, five star hotels, foreign embassies, parliament buildings and major organizations have this measure in place in order to monitor the staff and clients as they come in and out to ascertain no harmful contrabands are sneaked in or pilferage of equipments and other relevant materials from the organization. When entering a building like I&M where Standard Group have offices or Nation Centre where NTV is housed you have to produce your National ID, register your name, office and purpose of your visit then insured with a visitors pass in order to gain access to the premises. Monitored Entrances Ideally, an institution should have a single entrance only, monitored by staff personnel and equipped with an intercom system for communicating with anyone who comes to the door. Simply, an open door policy does not mean that every door need be left open and unlocked. You realize that hospitals, police headquarters, military barracks among others have personnel who are assigned on daily basis to check and verify individuals and motor vehicles that come in or leave the premises. Its purpose is to deter criminals and take note of every visitor for purposes of accountability when things go amiss. When entering the Times Tower where the Kenya Revenue Authority is housed, the security guards at the gate verifies visitors by their National Identity cards and or travelers passport and then a separate group of guards checks for any harmful materials by use of metal detectors. Visitors At no time should visitors be allowed to roam freely through your property unescorted or without being observed. That is especially true for individuals who expect to work on your most sensitive systems such as burglar alarms, fire alarms, communication systems or computers. Special diligence should be applied to those individuals when they visit your institution even if they are legitimate. For larger institutions, certain areas should be considered off-limits to all but authorized personnel. Allowing visitors free access to your facility does not mean that they should be allowed to go anywhere e.g. into restricted areas such as office spaces or that they should be given a sense that their actions are entirely unnoticed by the institution’s personnel. Some premises require having out of bound locations i.e. military barracks, production factories railway stations, air and seaports for purposes of security. Thus visitor should only be directed to designated zones only. Military barracks have their armories protected while airports have garages and main control rooms protected for security purposes. Employee Photo Identification Cards and Badges All employees should have and wear identification. Such badges make identification of non-employees immediate. Moreover, such cards will not only enable visitors to immediately identify those who work in an institution but will psychologically help employees understand that they are part of their agency’s security team. Photo identification should only be provided with accompanying education regarding their care, the procedure to be followed if they are lost, as well as the manner in which employees should approach unknown individuals. Creating ID badges requires thought. Cards should have clear pictures along with the employee’s name. The institution’s name should not necessarily be placed on the card. In any event, employees should be instructed that their card should be prominently worn while in the building and, for their own safety, kept from view when away from the building. In major hospitals like Nairobi hospital, Matter hospital among others every employee has a job ID which enables them access to all areas and distinguish them from patients, this reduces the chances of an admitted patient running away from the premise without paying the medical bill. Perimeter wall The perimeter wall, culverts and drainage units, lighting and other essential physical security areas. The drainage system and culverts can conceal entry and exit points for potential criminals. Culverts should be grilled to make it difficult for Criminals activities to occur. Parking lot Here the security personnel should be in a position to see how vehicles entering the premise or exiting are inspected. In some organizations parking badges are issued while in many more identification from drivers is not produced. In some organizations it is indicated cars parked at owner’s risk which injects confidence to car vandals and absorbs security responsibility. Parking should be offered to personnel with previous security background. The adjacent buildings and windows. The buildings and windows near a facility should not serve as a spring board for criminals to gain entry. The windows should be well and adequately secured to deny criminals an opportunity to access the facility under surveillance. Key Control and Locks Knowing who has which keys to which locks at all times is a vitally important issue. Failure to maintain such control may defeat the entire purpose of creating a security system. Institutions often simply assume that no one leaving their service either an employee or volunteer will subsequently break into their building or office. A sound key-control policy is essential to an effective security program. There should be a central key control location where masters are kept and access to which is strictly controlled. Registry. A central key control registry should be established for all key sand combinations. Employees and leadership should be required to sign for keys when they are received and the return of keys should be an important part of an exit process. Issuance. Supervisory approval should be required for the issuance of all keys and locks. Spare keys and locks should be kept in a centrally located cabinet, locked under the supervision of a designated employee. Master keys should be issued to a very restricted number of employees and these should be inventoried at least twice each year. Re-keying. When key control is lost, it may be worthwhile to have an institution’s locks Re-keyed or key should be surrendered incase employee is terminated or retired. Combination Locks and Codes. Where combination locks and coded locks are used, those combinations and codes should be changed at least every six months or when employees or leadership leave your premise. Combinations should also be kept under strict control of management. Computer systems and access. The computer system has become a concern in computer industry today. The security of electronic gadgets is pivotal in the growth of organizations, sabotage and shrinkage. The system should be protected from intruders or unauthorized access. The surveyor should include know who uses which computer, which services would be jeopardized by failure of a certain computer. Fires Are unpredictable hazards to organizations, homes and industries. The degree of vulnerability varies from one organization to another. The surveyor should check on the existing fire hazards, verify a match between hazards existing and fire suppression devices. Safes The area containing valuables is of paramount importance to a security survey. The protection of valuables should be consistent with security physical measures and criticality of a potential loss occurs. Safes and valuable storage areas should be fitted with adequate alarm systems. Surveillance Surveillance devices, CCTV’s and motion picture cameras are key to criminal activities detection, apprehension and deterrence. The surveyor should know their existence, location, protection and who monitors them. The security survey should capture the various departments in the organization, their operations and internal controls. Protective Lighting The value of adequate lighting as a deterrent to crime cannot be overemphasized. Adequate lighting is a cost-effective line of defense in preventing crime. Some Considerations on Lighting Lighting, both inside and outside, is most helpful and can be installed without becoming overly intrusive to neighbors. All entrances should be well lit. Fences should also be illuminated. For outside lighting, the rule of thumb is to create light equal to that of full daylight. The light should be directed downward away from the building or area to be protected and away from any security personnel you might have patrolling the facility. Where fencing is used, the lighting should be inside and above the fencing to illuminate as much of the fence as possible. Lighting should be placed to reduce contrast between shadows and illuminated areas. It should be uniform on walkways, entrances, exits, and especially in parking areas. Perimeter lights should be installed so the cones of illumination overlap, eliminating areas of total darkness if any one light malfunctions. Fixtures should be vandal-resistant. It is vital that repair of defects and replacement of worn-out bulbs be immediate. In addition, prevent trees or bushes from blocking lighting fixtures. You may wish to use timers and/or automatic photoelectric cells. Such devices provide protection against human error and ensure operation during inclement weather or when the building is unoccupied. A security professional should be contacted to help you with decisions on location and the best type of lighting for your individual institution. REFERENCE James K. Broder (200), Risk Analysis And The Security Survey 2rd Ed. Butterworth-Heinemann. USA. Lawrence J. Fennely (2003), Physical Security 3rd Edition. Elsevier Butterworth-Heinemann. Burlington, UK. Marc Weber Tobias (200), Locks Safes and Security, An International Police Reference 2nd Ed. Illinois USA.